firingsquads.org
Sources

Full text

FS-2026-ID-0001

The entire book,
published in full.

Every sentence of "The Lie of the Clean Kill" by Jeff Hood — 29 sections, roughly 87,620 words, including all endnotes. Nothing is excerpted.

FRONT MATTER

PART I: THE RETURN OF THE GUN

PART II: THE FOUR BROKEN PROMISES

094,143 words

Chapter 6: The First Promise — Certainty

Every argument for the firing squad, from Representative Skaug’s floor speech to the op-eds that ran in Idaho papers in the weeks before July 1, 2026, begins in the same place: a bullet cannot fail to be found the way a vein can. You do not need a trained phlebotomist to locate a man’s chest. You do not need a compounding pharmacy to manufacture a bullet. The rifle either fires or it does not, and if it fires, the argument goes, the outcome is not in question. This chapter exists because that argument is false, and it is false in a way that is now documented, autopsied and a matter of public record. Idaho did not choose the firing squad in ignorance of this record. It chose the firing squad with the record already sitting in front of it.

113,169 words

Chapter 8: The Third Promise — Honesty

Of the four promises this book examines, honesty is the one made most often by the firing squad’s more sophisticated defenders rather than its legislative sponsors, and it deserves to be taken more seriously than the other three precisely because it contains a real insight before it collapses into its own contradiction. The argument runs like this: lethal injection dresses killing up as medicine, with a gurney that looks like a hospital bed, an IV line, a curtain that opens onto something staged to resemble a clinical procedure. The firing squad, by contrast, does not pretend. It is a gun, aimed at a person, fired by other people and everyone in the room knows exactly what is happening. There is a version of this argument I find persuasive, and it deserves its strongest form before I show why, in practice, Idaho and South Carolina’s actual protocols do not earn the honesty they claim.

122,607 words

Chapter 9: The Fourth Promise — Free Choice

Brad Sigmon chose the firing squad. So did Mikal Mahdi. So did Stephen Corey Bryant. Each man, given a menu of three methods by South Carolina law, lethal injection, electrocution or the firing squad, selected the bullet and each selection has been reported, understandably, as a meaningful fact about that man’s own agency in the final weeks of his life. Sigmon’s lawyers said he chose the firing squad because he feared a repeat of the documented lethal injection complications other South Carolina prisoners had suffered, and because the state’s electric chair, more than a century old, carried its own well-documented history of malfunction.1 Mahdi’s attorneys said he feared dying “burned and mutilated” in the chair, or enduring a prolonged death strapped to a gurney and so selected what he judged, of three bad options, to be the least terrible.2 I do not doubt that these were genuine choices, in the narrow sense that each man weighed real information about three real methods and arrived at a preference. The question this chapter interrogates is whether “choice,” used in that narrow sense, can bear the moral weight the method’s defenders ask it to carry, the weight of making an execution more legitimate, more consensual, more acceptable because the person being killed selected the instrument of his own death from a list the state compiled.

PART III: IDAHO

153,137 words

Chapter 12: The Witnesses

I have stood in the witness role for twelve executions in five different states now, more than any other spiritual advisor in the United States. I have watched the state kill people by lethal injection and I have watched it kill people with nitrogen gas, including Kenneth Smith in Alabama in January 2024, the first person in the nation ever executed by that method, and Anthony Boyd in October 2025, whose execution became the longest by nitrogen gas on record.1 I have not yet stood in a firing squad chamber. No state has yet asked a spiritual advisor to occupy that role in exactly the configuration Idaho has now built, though South Carolina came closest: Brad Sigmon spent his last two hours with the Reverend Hilary Taylor, executive director of South Carolinians for Alternatives to the Death Penalty, who then sat as a witness while three volunteers shot him from fifteen feet. This chapter is, in part, an attempt to think through what that role will require, using everything I have learned in the rooms I have already stood in.

PART IV: BEYOND IDAHO

184,065 words

Chapter 15: Contagion — Utah, Oklahoma, Mississippi, Florida, and the Shape of What Comes Next

Idaho is one of five states that, as of this writing, explicitly authorize the firing squad by name. Chapter four told South Carolina’s story. This chapter takes up the remaining three — Utah, Oklahoma and Mississippi — along with Florida, which has opened the door to shooting-based executions through an entirely different legislative route, and Indiana, which came within three votes of walking through it, because the pattern of adoption across these jurisdictions tells you something Idaho’s case alone cannot: that the firing squad’s spread is not a series of isolated, unrelated legislative accidents. It is a single, traceable contagion, moving state to state along the same structural fault line, the collapse of lethal injection, and picking up speed as each new adoption makes the next one look less like a radical departure and more like an inevitability. This chapter also documents a case where the contagion was stopped, by three votes, in a state almost nobody expected to stop it.

PART V: THE VERDICT

APPENDICES

29118 words

About the Author

The Rev. Dr. Jeff Hood is a Catholic Priest (Old Catholic), nationally recognized theologian, and founder of the Execution Intervention Project — the nation’s leading nonprofit combining activism against death sentences, spiritual accompaniment, abolitionist thought development, theological education and consistent public engagement to serve people on death row. As a spiritual advisor to death row inmates nationwide, he has accompanied twelve men to their executions, including the first and eighth nitrogen hypoxia executions. Widely regarded as the leading spiritual voice on the death penalty, his work has been profiled in outlets ranging from the New York Times to Rolling Stone. documentary, The Spiritual Advisor. For his service and scholarship, he was nominated for the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize.